The number 666 appears as 616 in some early manuscripts
The famous 'number of the beast' in Revelation 13:18 is 666 in most Greek manuscripts and in every standard English translation. But a significant minority of early manuscripts — including the third-century Papyrus 115 and the fifth-century Codex Ephraemi — read 616 instead. The early church father Irenaeus (c. 180 AD) explicitly notes the variant in his work Against Heresies.
The full text
Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and that number is 666.
Context
Revelation 13:18 is the verse that gives the famous number of the beast. The Greek text in modern critical editions (Nestle-Aland 28th edition) reads ἑξακόσιοι ἑξήκοντα ἕξ (hexakosioi hexēkonta hex) — 666. A significant manuscript variant reads ἑξακόσιοι δέκα ἕξ (hexakosioi deka hex) — 616. The variant is attested in Papyrus 115 (P115, third century, discovered at Oxyrhynchus and published in 1999), in Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C, fifth century), and is explicitly noted by Irenaeus in Against Heresies 5.30.1 (c. 180 AD), who himself preferred the 666 reading. The Nero Caesar gematria explanation accounts for both numbers depending on whether the Hebrew or Greek transliteration of the name is used. See our [Revelation 13 passage entry](/passage/revelation-13/) for the full treatment.
The variant
The number of the beast in Revelation 13:18 is 666 in most Greek manuscripts and in every standard English translation. The Greek of the verse in modern critical editions reads:
ὁ ἀριθμὸς αὐτοῦ ἑξακόσιοι ἑξήκοντα ἕξ
“his number is six hundred and sixty-six”
A significant minority of manuscripts read 616 instead:
ὁ ἀριθμὸς αὐτοῦ ἑξακόσιοι δέκα ἕξ
“his number is six hundred and sixteen”
In ancient Greek manuscripts, the numbers were typically written as letters (using the Greek alphabetic numeral system) rather than spelled out, which means the variant is a difference of one letter (the digit value):
- 666 — written as χξϛ (chi-xi-stigma): 600 + 60 + 6
- 616 — written as χιϛ (chi-iota-stigma): 600 + 10 + 6
The single-letter difference between the two numerical sequences (ξ “60” vs ι “10”) is exactly the kind of small variant that can arise in manuscript copying.
The manuscript evidence
The 616 variant is attested in three principal witnesses:
Papyrus 115 (P115)
The earliest extant manuscript witness to Revelation 13:18 is Papyrus 115 (P115, also designated as P. Oxy. 4499). It is a third-century papyrus discovered among the Oxyrhynchus papyri and was published in 1999. The manuscript reads 616.
P115 is one of the most important early witnesses to the text of Revelation. Its publication in 1999 reopened the scholarly discussion of the textual situation — until P115 was published, the 616 reading had been known but seen as a marginal variant. P115’s status as the earliest substantial witness to the verse changed the picture: now the earliest manuscript reads 616.
Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C)
A fifth-century Greek manuscript, Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (designated C in textual criticism), also reads 616. This is one of the major uncial codices of the Greek New Testament — a palimpsest in which the original biblical text was scraped off and overwritten with works of Ephraem the Syrian in the twelfth century, but the underlying biblical text has been recovered.
Irenaeus’s testimony
The early church father Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–c. 202 AD), in his major work Against Heresies (Adversus Haereses, c. 180 AD), explicitly addresses the variant. In Book 5, chapter 30:
Irenaeus notes that some manuscripts available to him read 616 instead of 666, attributes this reading to manuscript error, and argues for 666 as the correct reading.
Irenaeus is significant because he is writing roughly a century after Revelation was composed. He is testifying not only to the existence of the 616 variant by his time but to the fact that the variant was already in circulation in the manuscripts available to second-century Christians. The variant is not a late corruption; it was present early.
The Nero Caesar gematria
In ancient Hebrew and Greek, letters serve as numerals. The practice of summing the numerical values of the letters in a name or word — gematria in Hebrew, isopsephy in Greek — was a recognised exegetical and rhetorical practice in Second Temple Judaism and in the early church.
The Hebrew transliteration of “Nero Caesar” — נרון קסר (neron qesar) — sums to 666:
| Letter | Value |
|---|---|
| נ (nun) | 50 |
| ר (resh) | 200 |
| ו (vav) | 6 |
| ן (final nun) | 50 |
| ק (qof) | 100 |
| ס (samekh) | 60 |
| ר (resh) | 200 |
| Total | 666 |
Without the final nun (the form נרו קסר, nero qesar), the same name sums to 616:
| Letter | Value |
|---|---|
| נ (nun) | 50 |
| ר (resh) | 200 |
| ו (vav) | 6 |
| ק (qof) | 100 |
| ס (samekh) | 60 |
| ר (resh) | 200 |
| Total | 616 |
So both manuscript readings — 666 and 616 — point to the same person (Nero Caesar) under different transliterations of the name. The 666 reading uses the longer Hebrew transliteration of the Latin form (Nero Caesar with the -on suffix and final nun); the 616 reading uses the shorter Hebrew form (Nero Caesar without the -on).
This solution to the gematria problem was first proposed in 1837 by the German theologian Ferdinand Benary and has since become widely accepted in critical New Testament scholarship. The 616 manuscript variant is one of the strongest external supports for the Nero identification, since both numbers are accounted for by the same proposed referent.
What modern translations do
Modern English translations universally print 666 in the main text. The 616 variant is typically noted in a footnote in critical-edition translations (NRSV, ESV, NET) and in some study Bibles. The KJV, BSB, NIV, and most popular translations print 666 without footnoting the variant.
The Nestle-Aland 28th edition (NA28) and the United Bible Societies 5th edition (UBS5) — the two principal critical Greek New Testaments used by scholars — print 666 in the main text and note the 616 variant in their critical apparatus.
For the broader treatment of Revelation 13 in context, see our passage entry on Revelation 13.
Why this matters
The 616 variant is one of the genuinely surprising textual variants in the New Testament — known to Irenaeus, attested in early papyrus and codex evidence, and integrally connected to the most plausible scholarly identification of the beast (Nero Caesar). Most readers encountering the number 666 on a coffee cup, in a film, or in apocalyptic discussion have no idea that some early manuscripts read 616 instead.
The variant does not destabilise the text — modern critical editions print 666 with confidence — but it complicates the assumption that the text has always read uniformly.
Related curiosities
Ezekiel chapter 1 — the vision of the four faces, the wheels, and the eyes
Ezekiel 1: four creatures with four faces each, wheels covered in eyes, a sapphire throne. One of the most elaborate visionary descriptions anywhere in the Hebrew Bible.
The forbidden fruit is never called an apple
Genesis 3 says 'fruit' (Hebrew peri) — never apple. The apple tradition probably comes from a Latin pun: malum means both 'evil' and 'apple' in Latin.
Jesus is never recorded as laughing in any Gospel
The four canonical Gospels record Jesus weeping, grieving, angering, rejoicing — but never laughing. The non-canonical Gospel of Thomas does record him laughing.
- CURIOSITY
Balaam's talking donkey
Numbers 22. A non-Israelite prophet's donkey sees an angel her owner cannot see, and speaks. One of two…
Read the full entry →
- CURIOSITY
Ezekiel chapter 1 — the vision of the four faces, the wheels, and the eyes
Ezekiel 1: four creatures with four faces each, wheels covered in eyes, a sapphire throne. One of the most…
Read the full entry →
- CURIOSITY
The 9 chapters of temple measurements nobody reads (Ezekiel 40–48)
Nine chapters of detailed temple architecture in Ezekiel — over 100 specific measurements. The temple has…
Read the full entry →